I'm sorry it's just weird that she has posted a topless video of herself when it is her but is also using another models pictures. If you're gonna scam people then fine but what's the point when you've already shown your actual tits?BTW this is who's images she's been stealing -You must be registered for see links
I thought this yesterday. My guess was she's pissed off stuff got leaked (topless video) so has decided to start to try and fuck people over. A scorned pissed off bird. That's allI'm sorry it's just weird that she has posted a topless video of herself when it is her but is also using another models pictures. If you're gonna scam people then fine but what's the point when you've already shown your actual tits?
I thought that too, surely it's easier to take a picture of your own tits to sell rather than edit someone else's and upload itI'm sorry it's just weird that she has posted a topless video of herself when it is her but is also using another models pictures. If you're gonna scam people then fine but what's the point when you've already shown your actual tits?
Notified the bird of what's she's done, hopefully she takes whatever actions she thinks are appropriateBTW this is who's images she's been stealing -You must be registered for see links
Anyone else notice the Surgical Scar from a previous close up is also not visible whatsoever when in theory it should be very obviously.You must be registered for see images
While I would agree with your statements mostly, it seems with Lottie however she's not very good at the editing part on said images, so it would be a visible edit, If you look in her previous picture which is clearly not her, the Panties edited on are not very well done. We don't even see an edit in the area to indicate the scar was there in the first place in this image, suggesting in the Original, it (rightfully) never exists so cant be her.True BUT females use filters & all sorts of editing these days on literally every. single. thing. they post & so it's hardly surprising if she chose to remove it from any pictures uploaded to social media etc etc
AgreedI'm sorry it's just weird that she has posted a topless video of herself when it is her but is also using another models pictures. If you're gonna scam people then fine but what's the point when you've already shown your actual tits?
weirdly it does seem like the bottom half could be lottie maybe but the top half is not (however the nipples also look edited IDK why)While I would agree with your statements mostly, it seems with Lottie however she's not very good at the editing part on said images, so it would be a visible edit, If you look in her previous picture which is clearly not her, the Panties edited on are not very well done. We don't even see an edit in the area to indicate the scar was there in the first place in this image, suggesting in the Original, it (rightfully) never exists so cant be her.
weirdly it does seem like the bottom half could be lottie maybe but the top half is not (however the nipples also look edited IDK why)
You must be registered for see images
I know what I am saying is it must be more effort to do that vs take a tit picShe’s just edited the original picture to try and make it look more like her body/skintone/tits, nothing deeper than that.
I was actually going to mention this myself, there’s no way she’s edited the scar from all the other photos, it’s not visible in the video either, I doubt she has the ability to edit videos like thatTrue BUT females use filters & all sorts of editing these days on literally every. single. thing. they post & so it's hardly surprising if she chose to remove it from any pictures uploaded to social media etc etc
I wasn't sure what to believe when I started reading these recent comments about her potentially stealing someone else's pics but the two being overlapped does make it seem mighty similar with just some bad editing.weirdly it does seem like the bottom half could be lottie maybe but the top half is not (however the nipples also look edited IDK why)
You must be registered for see images
Heard back from her and all i can say is that she is not happy, Lottie if you're reading this you messed up hugely!Notified the bird of what's she's done, hopefully she takes whatever actions she thinks are appropriate
lmao morals. Being a slut, but refraining from showing nudity that people pay for is being a slut and a liar. She's not even a good slut. Her morals are contradictory. She's ironic. Mind the sniping, she seems like a dumbass and this is the first I've ever heard of her. Morals that aren't good are definitely a bad thing.Just because she's not a committed sl*t like some on OF, doesn't mean she's flakey. Personally i like the pace she releases content & what that content has been so far, as it doesn't give everything away & leaves room for the imagination. In other words, she has morals & that's never a bad thing.
I'm not suggesting it's the same level and tbh I don't even know what country she's living in atm but doesn't this kinda link to what happened with Stephen bear. It's not revenge porn but it's posting someone else's "private" images without permission. Might randomly be a criminal issue not just a civil one?Heard back from her and all i can say is that she is not happy, Lottie if you're reading this you messed up hugely!